Popular Posts Today

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Obama's housing scorecard

Written By Emdua on Senin, 17 September 2012 | 01.56

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The housing market is gaining strength thanks in part to government programs aimed at helping struggling homeowners, the latest Obama Administration Housing Scorecard released Thursday found.

"The Obama Administration's efforts to speed housing recovery are showing clear signs of traction," said Erika Poethig, Acting Assistant Secretary for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which releases the report in conjunction with the Department of the Treasury.

Home values are back to levels not seen since the beginning of the Obama administration and the number of homeowners who are underwater on their mortgage is down 11% since last year, the report said. In addition, more than half a million borrowers have had their loans refinanced through government efforts like the Home Affordable Refinance Program this year.

"It is clear that we're making progress. But with so many households still struggling to make ends meet, we have important work ahead," Poethig said.

Another boost to the housing market came last April, when the attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia inked a $25 billion settlement deal with the nation's five largest banks over so-called robo-signing foreclosure abuses. That deal is expected to help another couple of million borrowers reduce their mortgage payments.

Related: 'I'm trapped in a high-rate mortgage'

Since the administration started rolling out its programs in April 2009, more than 5.4 million borrowers have received aid, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) said.

Here's a rundown of the government's mortgage relief efforts and how they've fared:

Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)

Launch: March 2009

Borrowers affected: As of July 2012, there have been 1.9 million trial modifications started. More than 1 million have made the transition into permanent modifications. Some 235,000 of those have been canceled due to re-defaults or because borrowers sold their homes.

This program enables eligible borrowers to lower their first mortgage payments to more affordable and sustainable levels. Lenders receive incentives to reduce mortgage payments for at-risk borrowers; the target is 31% of income.

HAMP originally fell well short of estimates that it would lower mortgage payments for 3 to 4 million borrowers. And, many early workouts failed as borrowers soon re-defaulted on their loans.

Track record: HAMP's record has improved and re-default rates have declined, but they're still troubling. As of July, nearly 19% of all borrowers with HAMP modifications are at least two payments behind 12 months after their loans were modified.

HAMP modifications have slowed to a crawl lately, with just 17,000 permanent modifications started in July.

The modifications have led to a total of more than $14.4 billion in lowered borrowers' payments, according to the Treasury Department.

Home Affordable Refinance Program

Launch: March 2009

Participants: 1.5 million

This program helps borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments but are having a hard time refinancing their mortgage because they are underwater or owe more on their home than it is worth. The home must be underwater due to falling home prices and the mortgage must be backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Originally, HARP allowed homeowners to refinance if their loan balances were between 80% and 105% of the market value of their home. But after disappointing initial results, the rule was changed to include borrowers with loan-to-value ratios of up to 125%. Later, they removed that cap altogether.

Track record: The changes have helped make HARP one of the more successful government programs. The number of HARP refinancings has accelerated with more issued during the first seven months of the year than in all of 2011.

More than half the loans refinanced in June and July went to homeowners with loan-to-value ratios above 105%.

Second Lien Modification Program (2MP)

Launch: April 2009

Participation: 90,000 borrowers

The Second Lien Modification Program (or 2MP) provides assistance to homeowners who have second mortgages or home equity lines of credit in addition to their primary mortgages.

Many potential mortgage modifications have hit roadblocks because lenders of home equity loans and lines of credit refuse to cooperate. After all, the first mortgage holder typically gets paid first when an underwater mortgage gets modified and there's often nothing left for the second lien holder.

Related: Housing improves in hard-hit swing states

Yet, second lien holders have to agree to a mortgage modification -- and to take a loss -- before a loan can be refinanced. Under 2MP, the government pays cash incentives to the lenders of the second loans so they will allow the refinancing to proceed.

Track record: So far, only 20,664 borrowers have had their second mortgages completely wiped out by their second loan lenders, with an additional 64,977 receiving a partial reduction in their principals. That's a far cry from the estimated one million or more that the program was created to help.

The average amount involved is more than $62,000 for a full elimination of a loan balance and about $8,900 for a partial elimination.

Hardest Hit States Fund

Launch: February, 2010

Participation: 74,000 homeowners have been assisted with another 35,000 applications being processed.

The Obama administration set aside $7.6 billion for foreclosure prevention funding for states that were hit hardest by the economic downturn.

Eighteen states and the District of Columbia participate in the program and each spends the money on programs they determine best meet the needs of their residents.

About 70% of the $1.1 billion that has been spent for direct homeowner assistance has been in the form of unemployment assistance to help homeowners make their mortgage payments while they seek work, according to Andrea Risotto, a spokeswoman for the Treasury Department. Much of the rest went toward helping homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship get current on their payments.

Track record: Only a fraction of the funds has been spent. Demand from unemployed borrowers has been much less than anticipated, according to Risotto. Many homeowners don't reach out for assistance right after they lose their job because they think it will just be a short-term setback, she said. By the time, they seek help their options have become more limited.

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA)

Launch: April, 2010

All HAFA agreements started: 85,023

Aimed at borrowers who are underwater on their mortgages and who've been denied a modification via HAMP, HARP or other programs, HAFA is a last-ditch effort to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. They still, however, lose their homes.

The program pays cash to both borrowers and lenders who complete short sales, deals in which the bank that holds the mortgage agrees to accept a sale price for the home that is less than what it is owed and forgives the unpaid amount of the mortgage debt.

Related: Obama's economy: A snapshot

The program includes deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, which are agreements in which the bank takes back the home directly from the borrower as full repayment.

Track record: HAFA was also an early disappointment, with few borrowers taking advantage of the program. Others who would have participated, were ineligible because they did not meet a 31% debt-to-income requirement for approval. That requirement was removed in early 2011.

As of July, 60,572 of the 85,000 HAFA agreements started were completed.

Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA)

Launch: June 2010

Trial modifications started: 92,777

This program is for borrowers with loans that are not backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). It requires servicers to evaluate the benefit of reducing mortgage principal for loans in which the balance has exceeded the value of the home by 15% or more.

Loan servicers are not required to reduce the principal, just to consider doing so. The mortgages may be ones in the HAMP program.

Track record: For those who are eligible for it, PRA can result in substantial savings. The typical reduction in principal is nearly $70,000. Lenders, however, have put few borrowers in the program.

Home Affordable Unemployment Program (HAUP)

Launch: July 2010

Participation: 25,326 forbearance plans have been started since launch.

This forbearance program reduces or suspends mortgage payments for unemployed borrowers for up to 12 months.

Track record: Participation has been limited. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA, which represent a huge share of the market, have their own forbearance programs and borrowers with loans backed by those entities do not qualify for HAUP. Only borrowers with loans owned by the banks can participate.

FHA Short Refinance

Launch: September, 2010

Participation: 1,645 through August, with 107 issued that month.

This program is also designed to help underwater borrowers who remain current on their mortgage to refinance into more affordable FHA-insured loans.

Under the program, the mortgage servicer must first agree to write off at least 10% of the principal before the borrower can refinance. The modified loan will help put them back in the black, at least on their first mortgage: The debt-to-value ratio has to exceed 97.75%. With any second mortgage factored in, it can't exceed 115%.

Track record: This got off to a very slow start, with only about 15 refinances done by early 2011. It was nearly killed off by the House Financial Service Committee but it is still limping along. Only 1,645 borrowers have taken advantage of the program.

Emergency Homeowner's Loan Program (EHLP)

Launch: June, 2011

Participants: About 15,000

End date: September, 2011

This $1 billion program offered interest-free loans of up to $50,000 to homeowners who were hit with a job or income loss and who resided in one of the 32 states not covered by the Hardest Hit States program.

Related: Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?

Loans were restricted to those who have a household income of $75,000 or less, or earn less than 120% of the median household income for a community. They must have missed at least three payments, been on the verge of losing their home and demonstrated the ability to resume payments once their period of unemployment ends.

Track record: This program fell well short of its target of helping 30,000 borrowers by the time it ended in September of 2011. Only about half the allocation, $500 million, was spent.

$25 Billion foreclosure abuse settlement

Launch: April, 2012

Participants: 137,846 have received some type of relief as of June 30.

The deal inked between the attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia and the federal government and the nation's five major lenders --- Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Citibank (C, Fortune 500), Wells Fargo (BWF)and Ally Financial (ALLYPRB) -- aimed to settle charges that the banks had abused the foreclosure process with improper paperwork and procedures.

Under the settlement, the banks agreed to reduce payments for borrowers by either reducing the principal they owed on their loans or cutting their interest rate.

Track record: A preliminary progress report released last month revealed that the banks had already submitted claims for $10.6 billion in mortgage relief. The majority of those claims, however, were credits that the banks took for short sales.

The banks did make some progress in implementing the mortgage modification part of their pledge. About $1 billion in principal reduction modifications have occurred thus far, according to the report, but another $4 billion in principal reduction modifications were not counted because they're in the trial stage.

By the time the first official report is released as scheduled in November, another $3 billion in debt forgiveness should be counted, according to HUD secretary Shaun Donovan.

The banks have claimed credit for about $103 million for refinancing borrowers mortgages into lower rate loans. To top of page

First Published: September 14, 2012: 6:42 AM ET

15 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/69wZ0Z1HH-E/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
01.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

Track U.S. stock futures and premarket movers

Sep 14 4:23pm:

Investors were on a Fed-induced high this week, pushing stocks to their best levels in several years. More

What's Moving Pre-Market

S&P 500 Gainers & Losers Price Pre-Market
% Change
Volume
SPLSStaples Inc 12.55 +4.93% 456
CLFCliffs Natural Resou... 45.19 +4.65% 247
ANRAlpha Natural Resour... 8.52 +3.52% 427
FCXFreeport-McMoRan Cop... 42.96 +2.80% 297
XUnited States Steel ... 22.90 +2.51% 193
CMAComerica Inc 32.73 -1.12% 14,547
VARVarian Medical Syste... 61.37 -0.63% 62,090
MDTMedtronic Inc 42.15 -0.35% 1,800
MSIMotorola Solutions I... 49.96 -0.32% 1,600
XRXXerox Corp 7.72 -0.26% 200

Data as of Sep 14

Pre-Market Quote

Sponsored By:

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/skFcYxb9Wrc/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
01.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

Intrade: Fed helped Obama's re-election odds

Obama's re-election chances shot up on Intrade after the Fed's QE3 announcement.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Did Ben Bernanke and friends boost President Obama's re-election chances? Intrade investors who bet on the outcome of the presidential race seem to think so.

The online futures market allows investors to wager on any number of future events, from the presidential election to whether Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will be arrested.

In the 90 minutes after the Fed announced a new round of economic stimulus on Thursday, the odds of an Obama victory increased to 65% from 63.5%.

It was a relatively big bump, and gave Obama the best odds for re-election on the site since early May 2011, shortly after Osama bin Laden was killed. The mission, which was ordered by the president, raised his odds to 69%.

Obama's Intrade surge may have been more tied to the stock market than an improved economic outlook, since the Fed's actions won't be able to lift hiring or improve other key economic readings before the Nov. 6 election, said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist for Capital Economics

Intrade's predictions on Obama's election chances closely mirror the S&P 500 stock index. Thursday, after the Fed decision, U.S. stocks closed at a nearly five-year high.

Dales said he believes one of the reasons for the long-term linkage between the president's re-election chances and the S&P is that an improving economy lifts both stocks and people's view of the incumbent. But a sudden move like that on Thursday is due to expectations about the markets' direction.

Related: Republicans blame Obama for Fed action

"It does make sense that if the stock market is doing better, Obama's chances are better," he said. To top of page

First Published: September 14, 2012: 12:57 PM ET

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/BjK4YCZJrYk/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
01.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

White House details fiscal cliff spending cuts

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Under pressure from Congress, the Obama administration on Friday detailed for the first time how more than $100 billion in spending cuts slated for January will ripple out across thousands of federal programs and projects.

The White House budget office, in a report mandated by Congress, said the cuts "would have a devastating impact on important defense and nondefense programs."

As a result of the so-called sequester, deficits would be reduced by nearly $1 trillion over 10 years. At the same time, economists say it could help push the country back into recession by abruptly pulling so much money out of the economy. (Related: CBO warns of fiscal cliff recession)

Cuts in domestic spending would affect everything from government salaries and private-sector contracts to research, air traffic control, border patrol, food safety, the FBI, housing programs, food assistance, after-school programs and education grants, according to the report.

Efforts by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to respond to terrorism or other catastrophic events would be undermined.

Military personnel and the Department of Veterans Affairs will be exempt from the budget ax. What's more, the Department of Defense would be able to shift funds so that critical military readiness would not be impaired, the report said.

But, it added, the scheduled defense cuts would reduce the readiness of many non-deployed units, delay investments in new equipment and facilities, cut back on needed repairs and reduce services for military families.

Top defense officials have warned that further cuts to defense could hurt national security. And defense contractors have been saying for months that the cuts could result in significant layoffs in their industry.

The White House budget office didn't estimate how many workers -- in the government or private sector -- would be fired or furloughed because of the cuts.

A senior administration official did allow that "this would have a significant effect on the federal workforce."

While some programs would be exempt from the cuts, most would not since the sequester calls for a largely across-the-board slashing of funds. Those cuts would fall disproportionately on discretionary programs and projects -- or those that Congress funds year to year.

Fiscal cliff: What's really in it

But some mandatory programs would feel the knife's edge as well.

Among programs subject to reductions, those in discretionary defense would be cut 9.4%. And nondefense programs would lose 8.2% of their funding.

Medicare would be reduced by 2%, but those cuts would only affect providers not benefits. Other mandatory programs would be cut between 7.6% and 10%.

The report is likely to be greeted with predictable horror by both Democrats and Republicans. That's because no one in Congress or the White House thinks the spending cuts are a good idea.

Passed as part of the Budget Control Act -- which put an end to last summer's bitter debt ceiling fight -- the automatic cuts were designed to be noxious to both sides of the aisle.

The intent was to force lawmakers to negotiate a bipartisan debt-reduction plan to replace the so-called sequester. But partisan division over taxes and other issues has thus far prevented any such negotiation from taking place. (Related: Now not the time for austerity)

"[N]o amount of planning can mitigate the effect of these cuts," the White House report stated. "Sequestration is a blunt and indiscriminate instrument. It is not the responsible way for our nation to achieve deficit reduction."

No one expects Congress to even begin to seriously address the issue in earnest until after the presidential election. And then lawmakers will have left themselves only a few weeks to both figure out how to replace the sequester and how to handle an unprecedented number of tax increases slated to go into effect next year. To top of page

First Published: September 14, 2012: 2:25 PM ET

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/FJO8KNFORhc/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
01.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

SEC slaps NYSE for 'improper' exchange of market info

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission reached a $5 million settlement agreement with the New York Stock Exchange for giving some traders "an improper head start on trading information," announced the federal agency on Friday.

The SEC said this is the first time it has ever imposed a financial penalty against an exchange. The agency accused the NYSE of violating its rules "over an extended period of time beginning in 2008 by sending data through two of its priority feeds before sending data to the consolidated feeds."

The NYSE allegedly sent "information about its current best-priced quotations and execution prices" to its subscribers before it sent the data to a different network processor that was available to the public.

This means that certain customers were able to obtain trading information before other customers, giving them an unfair edge, according to the SEC. "The disparities ranged from single-digit milliseconds to, on occasion, multiple seconds," said the SEC, in a legal document.

NYSE Euronext (NYX), NYSE's parent company, confirmed that it had entered the $5 million settlement without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations that it violated market rules and maintained improper computerized record-keeping from 2008 to 2010.

Related: SEC shuts down alleged $600 million Ponzi scheme

"The alleged timing differentials, which were generally at the level of milliseconds, were the result of technology issues that have been resolved," said the NYSE, in a prepared statement.

The SEC said that even milliseconds can give some traders an unfair advantage.

The SEC said that the "first-of-its-kind charges" apply to the NYSE and NYSE Euronext. They are required to hire an independent consultant to review their market delivery systems to bring them into compliance and to ensure that the information leaks do not happen again. To top of page

First Published: September 14, 2012: 12:36 PM ET

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/s7mrCAb96ak/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
01.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

European leaders 'still behind the curve'

Written By Emdua on Minggu, 16 September 2012 | 16.43

Following years of setbacks and shortfalls, efforts to stabilize the euro currency union finally appear to be taking shape, with policymakers scoring two key victories in as many weeks.

"It's encouraging to see, but all these measures were necessary to preserve the status quo," said Marie Diron, senior economic adviser at Ernst & Young in London. "Without these things, the situation would have been quite dire, but we've learned to be cautious."

Last week, the European Central Bank unveiled a bond buying plan to help struggling sovereign nations, and this week, the German Constitutional Court backed the region's new bailout fund.

European Union officials also released a proposal for a centralized banking authority, though it will likely be years before a so-called banking union is in place. And in the Netherlands, pro-euro political parties came out ahead in this week's general election.

Altogether, that has lessened the risk of the euro currency union falling apart

"I see the trend as basically positive," C. Fred Bergsten, a former U.S. Treasury assistant secretary for international affairs, told reporters Thursday during a conference call organized by the Council on Foreign Relations. "The doomsayers have told us time and again that the apocalypse is at hand, but it has not happened."

Still, it remains to be seen if leaders can overcome their political differences and make the difficult decisions necessary to implement the plans, said former U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who co-chairs the CFR.

Past progress has been undermined by a lack of unity among eurozone leaders.

"I continue to think that they're behind curve," said Rubin. "This will not get resolved until the political leaders do what they need to do."

Related: A party in Europe, but a hangover is coming

The latest policy moves will buy time, but they do not address the region's fundamental problems, such as a lack of economic competitiveness and weak growth in Spain and Italy, said Ben May, an economist at Capital Economics. In addition, the economic outlook has deteriorated significantly this year, with eurozone gross domestic product shrinking in the second quarter.

"These problems can't be solved with loans or by subsidizing government borrowing costs," May said.

In the weeks ahead, investors will focus on Spain, which stands to benefit from the ECB's bond buying program. But the ECB has made it clear that Spain must first commit to a program of budget reforms and outside surveillance by activating either the European Stability Mechanism or its predecessor, the European Financial Stability Facility.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has so far resisted such a move, especially since the government's borrowing costs have plunged on hopes of an ECB intervention. The yield on Spain's 10-year bond dropped to a low of 5.6% this week, down from a high of 7.7% in July.

"These are hardly the market conditions in which one would expect Madrid to go cap-in-hand to the eurozone rescue facilities," said Nicholas Spiro, director of London-based consultancy Spiro Sovereign Strategy.  "It's a perverse situation in many ways. Just when we finally have a half-way credible bond-buying plan in place to help shore up Spain and Italy, neither country wants to make use of it."

Italy has also seen its borrowing costs fall as investors see Spain as a threat to the stability of Italy's €1 trillion bond market.

Italian Prime Minster Mario Monti has suggested that Italy would not need to tap the rescue funds, although investors are concerned that steps to overhaul the nation's economy will falter after Monti steps down next year.

Greece, a perennial source of concern, is also on investors' minds.

The Greek government is in talks this week with officials from its 'troika' of international lenders, including the European Union and International Monetary Fund.

Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras is hoping to secure a two-year extension of the bailout agreement Greece's caretaker government signed in March.

But the troika has reportedly rejected some of the €11.5 billion of spending cuts the Greek government has to make in order to secure its next installment of bailout money. A top IMF official told the Wall Street Journal this week that Greece will need additional financing, which could involve more loans or a restructuring of Greek debt held by official institutions such as the ECB.

On the banking front, investors are eager to see how EU governments respond to the proposal for an EU-wide banking regulator.

Related: EU banking union faces a long road

The proposal, which centers on the ECB, has been in the works for several months, but there appears to be some disagreement over how much power it will have.

Germany, for example, wants the ECB to focus only on large "systemically important" banks, since overseeing all 6,000 banks in Europe would be unwieldy. But many of the problem banks are small or medium-sized institutions, such as the Landesbanken in Germany and Spain's so-called Cajas.

In addition, analysts say the United Kingdom may be reluctant to cede authority over its powerful domestic banks to the EU regulator.

"I think there will eventually be a compromise on these issues," said Diron. "But we're not there yet."

Posted in: banking union, debt crisis, ECB, euro, European Central Bank, eurozone, GDP, germany, greece, italy, spain

15 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/S8Uvsk06lHQ/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
16.43 | 0 komentar | Read More

Buyers already waiting in line for iPhone 5

Five days to go: Hazem, Sage, Jessica, Keenen, Jackie, Brian and Joseph

FORTUNE -- In the popular imagination -- and in Samsung TV ads -- the people willing to wait in line for days to buy the newest Apple (AAPL) gewgaw are hopeless fanboys and fangirls who need to get a life.

That attitude is so 2007.

Today, occupying a space near enough to the front of an iPhone queue to draw media attention is a commodity with tangible commercial value.

The two guys from Kent camped out in front of Apple's Covent Garden store in London, for example, are hoping to raise thousands of pounds for Cancer Research UK.

And each of the seven New Yorkers we met in front of the big glass cube of Apple's Fifth Avenue store on Sunday -- five days and nights before the iPhone 5 goes on sale -- was there on business of one sort or another.

#1 and #2: Hazem Sayed, 54, and his marketing manager Sage (short for Sagittarius), 31, set up camp Thursday at 8 a.m. -- eight days early -- to promote a social media startup called Vibe. Sayed describes it as a tool "to create ad hoc communities of people who happen to be in the same place" -- like an iPhone line. He's invited local developers to use Vibe this week to demo their mobile apps (through a projected image on the sidewalk in front of the growing crowd) and he'll invite the people in the queue to vote -- through Vibe -- for their favorite. "It's a real blue-collar app," says Sage, whose resume includes opening up empty buildings for squatters and doing logistics for Occupy Wall Street. "Jet setters don't get the app because they don't have a neighborhood."

#3 and 4: Jessica Mellow, 27, and Keenen Thompson, 22, are old hands at this. We met them last October when they were Nos. 2 and 1, respectively, in the iPhone 4S line. (See 17 days in the iPhone line: Wet, cold & smelling like Cheetos.) Mellow, who makes a living doing promotions and movie screenings and does body painting (as an artist and model) on the side, is blogging about her experience this week at iphonewhatever.com. Keenen, who worked at Apple retail for a 2.5 years, is now the assistant to a Conde Nast fashion writer. Last year their line-sitting was subsidized by a stipend from Gazelle, a Boston-based company that does a brisk business buying old iPhones just before the launch of a new one. This year Gazelle is doing it again, paying for Mellow and Thompson's iPhone 5s and providing food, drink, camp chairs, sleeping bags, Gazelle-branded t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats, wrist bands, and, in case of rain, a tent.

#4, #5, and #6: Jackie Lin, 15, Brian Ceballo, 18, and Joseph Cruz, 19, lucked out. Lin thought he'd hold a early spot in line and sell it to someone with less patience and more money. Ceballo and Cruz, who are cousins, wanted the new phone, but as aspiring musicians (pop, R&B and hip hop), also hoped to get some of that good free publicity that attends an Apple launch event. All three lucked out when Gazelle showed up and offered to support the first five customers in line. Sayed and Sage, who had their own Vibe thing going, passed. These guys snapped up the offer, and when I met them they were all decked out in Gazelle gear, down to the bright orange wristbands. Lin, meanwhile, has changed his business plan. As long as Gazelle paying for the iPhone 5, he's going to keep his spot and the free phone.

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/ucefNvTaZ04/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
13.53 | 0 komentar | Read More

Buffett: My cancer treatment is done

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Billionaire investor Warren Buffett says he has completed treatment for a mild case of prostate cancer, according to a published report.

Speaking Friday to executives of newspapers he has recently acquired, Buffett was quoted by The Omaha World-Herald as saying "It's a great day for me. Today I had my 44th and last day of radiation." The World-Herald is owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA, Fortune 500), Buffett's investing company.

In a letter to shareholders in April, Buffett disclosed that he had Stage 1 prostate cancer. Buffett, who is now 82, said at the time that the cancer was "not remotely life-threatening."

Less than a month later, Buffett told shareholders gathered in Omaha, Neb., that the cancer was "a non-event."

"Maybe I'll get shot by a jealous husband, but this is a really minor thing," he said about the risk to his life.

Related: Berkshire earnings drop on derivatives

Buffett, one of the world's richest men as a result of his investing prowess, has yet to publicly reveal a succession plan, though he says he has already informed Berkshire's board about his preferred candidates. Upon his departure, Buffett's job will be divided between a CEO in charge of operations and one or more executives in charge of investments.

The World-Herald quoted Buffett as saying he's relieved to be done with the radiation.

"I'll be feeling the side effects for a few weeks yet, but I am so glad to say that's over," Buffett said. To top of page

First Published: September 16, 2012: 2:36 PM ET

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/qHbCH7ycTqc/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
11.55 | 0 komentar | Read More

THE RICH GET RICHER

Wealthiest Americans have 288 times net worth of typical family

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The wealth gap between the richest Americans and the typical family more than doubled over the past 50 years.

In 1962, the top 1% had 125 times the net worth of the median household. That shot up to 288 times by 2010, according to a new report by the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute.

That trend is happening for two reasons: Not only are the rich getting richer, but the middle class is also getting poorer.

Most Americans below the upper echelon have suffered a decline in wealth in recent decades. The median household saw its net worth drop to $57,000 in 2010, down from $73,000 in 1983. It would have been $119,000 had wealth grown equally across households.

The top 1%, on the other hand, saw their average wealth grow to $16.4 million, up from $9.6 million in 1983. This is due in large part to the growing income inequality divide, as well as the sharp rise in value of stocks over the period.

Net worth counts all assets including real estate holdings, minus debts.

Related: Obama's economy: A snapshot

"The distribution of wealth is way more unequal than the super-unequal distribution of income and wages," said Heidi Shierholz, an economist with the institute.

The biannual report, entitled The State of Working America, looks at the changes in income, jobs, mobility, poverty, wealth and other areas in recent decades, as well as during the Great Recession.

The effects of the Great Recession

While the wealth and income gaps have been expanding for decades, the report shows that the trend was accelerated during the Great Recession. Median family income was 6% lower in 2010 than a decade earlier.

As for wealth, while the housing bust and the spike in unemployment hurt people at all levels of the spectrum, it affected middle-class and lower-income Americans to a greater degree.

The average wealth of the top 1% dropped just 15.6% between 2007 and 2010, while the median net worth of American households sank 47.1% That large decline in median wealth is largely responsible for driving the gap to such heights.

Homeowners at the bottom of the wealth distribution were, on average, underwater, meaning they had no equity in their homes because their mortgages were more than the property's value.

The Great Recession hit black and Latino households particularly hard. It wiped out half the wealth of a typical black household, leaving them with a median net worth of $4,900. And the median wealth of Latino families plummeted 86.3% to $1,300.

This compares to $97,000 for white households.

Part of the reason for the eye-popping statistics is because blacks and Latinos had a relatively small amount of net worth so the drop is larger in percentage terms. Also, their homeownership rates grew faster than whites' during the housing boom, but fell further when it collapsed.

The typical black and Latino households don't own any stocks, and the typical black family has no home equity.

Overall, the widening of the wealth gap in recent decades is due to two things, Shierholz said. The increase in income inequality means the wealthy have more to save and invest every year. Furthermore, the growth of Wall Street means that the rich, who are much more likely to own stocks, accumulated wealth even faster.

"The growth in wealth we did see got funneled to the top and it didn't spur faster growth in the middle," Shierholz said. To top of page

First Published: September 11, 2012: 5:30 AM ET

16 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_topstories/~3/DtzeJ7-C3-8/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
09.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Warna Merah Siap takut

Written By Emdua on Selasa, 27 Maret 2012 | 01.30

Warna Merah Siap takut Warna merah selalu diasumsikan sebagai warna yang berani. Tapi bagi pria, warna merah bisa menjadi petanda gairah seksual yang tinggi.

Ketika melihat wanita mengenakan gaun berwarna merah, pria cenderung akan tertarik secara seksual. Mereka menganggap wanita dengan balutan busana merah memiliki daya tarik seksual lebih tinggi dibanding yang berbalut busana warna lain.

"Keterkaitan ini bisa berakar dari fungsi utama biologi kita sebagai manusia," ujar peneliti Universitas Rochester, dikutip YourTango.

Pada penelitian terakhir yang diterbitkan Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, peneliti menunjukkan foto dari wanita yang sama terhadap 25 pria. Foto tersebut menunjukkan wanita yang sama menggunakan kaus berwana merah atau putih. Setelah melihat foto tersebut, mereka ditanya bagaimana model wanita tersebut dalam hubungan asmara.

Menanggapi pertanyaan tersebut, mereka memberikan penilaian daya tarik seksual yang lebih tinggi pada wanita dengan pakaian berwarna merah. Meskipun model yang ada adalah orang yang sama, wanita berpakaian merah tampak menarik secara seksual dan tampak mampu melakukan hal-hal yang "nakal".

Para peneliti melihat hal ini berhubungan dengan interaksi seksual yang terjadi pada monyet. Kulit hewan primata betina ini akan menjadi merah untuk menunjukkan bahwa mereka memasuki masa subur dan siap untuk dikawinkan dengan pejantan.

Tak beda dengan manusia, menurut peneliti, ketika wanita mengenakan pakaian berwarna merah berarti mereka ingin mengatakan maksud terselubung. Karena ketika memasuki masa subur, secara instingtif mereka akan menggunakan pakaian-pakaian yang dapat meningkatkan rasa percaya diri untuk menggoda pria. Dan, warna merah selalu menjadi pilihan wanita untuk tampil percaya diri dan berbeda.

Jadi, melangkahlah percaya diri dengan pakaian berwarna merah untuk mencuri hati pria idaman Anda Warna Merah Siap takut
01.30 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger